Friday, September 20, 2002 11:59 PM
Counting Distribution
PITBULLS:
You
can not get away from bidding skills in the game of Bridge . Even on defense and declarer play you must have a
thorough understanding of the opponents & your bidding to apply patterns to their distribution. You
can not defend properly without having a hypothetical
“count of declarers hand” on every hand
– no exceptions !
The following article by Kantar ( jumping in at the middle somewhere )
concentrates on the responder becoming declarer so as defenders you want to
count the distribution for those hands .
Two
simple hands came up Thursday night for a total loss of 32 IMPs because of a
lack of applications of patterns again . The opponents are in a vul 4♥ and I led the spade 8 . The board comes down with xxx Qxxx KQx Axx and you have AQJxx J Jxxx Jxx . You
plug in the spade pattern and its 5-3-3-2 so you put in the spade jack. Why ?
Even though it’s a suit contract , NT rules apply here. The only way you are
beating 4 hearts is if partner can contribute . You need an entry to your
spades when he gets in though. Partner has the diamond Ace and heart King so
you get 4 tricks. You place the spade Ace at trick one and you suffer the
ignominy of watching the 3-3 club brake take your spade trick away and them
making it. Instead of winning 4 IMPS you lose 12.
You
should only be deceptive with count if it is going to hurt declarer more then
partner. Usually its best to give partner count and ignore the fact that
declarer is getting the same information. Here is Eddie Kantar giving examples
of translating the opponents bidding into patterns. This is why experts quiz you
so much on your bidding. They are trying to form a defensive plan by applying
patterns & not just “admiring your bidding techniques J
“ .
Excerpt
from
“Eddie Kantar Teaches Advanced Bridge
Defense”
© 1999 Edwin B. Kantar
Responder is quite apt to become the declarer, particularly if opener supports one of responder’s suits, if responder has a long, strong suit, or if responder bids notrump and plays there.
The rules
stay in place. If responder bids two suits,
assume 5-4; if responder bids the same suit, assume a six-card suit; if the
initial response is a natural 2NT or 3NT (not 1NT) assume one of the three
balanced distributions.
Opener Responder
1§
1©
pass
The
assumption is that responder has six hearts and fewer than four spades. Had
responder jumped to 3© over 1ª, the
assumption would still be a six-card suit. However, had responder jumped to 4© over 1ª, not knowing of any heart support, seven
hearts is more likely than six.
Opener Responder
1§
1ª
2ª
2NT
3ª pass
Responder has
four spades and denies four hearts. With 4-4 in the majors, the normal response
is 1©. What about diamonds? Has responder
denied four diamonds by skipping over that suit too? No. In the modern game the
emphasis is on bidding major suits as quickly as possible before competition,
particularly preemptive competition, may cause you to ‘lose the suit’. With
strong hands, hands approaching opening-bid strength, responder can afford to
go slowly and bid 1¨ (especially with strong diamonds) and
then bid the major next, but with weaker hands, the major suit is normally bid
first. (As usual, you should realize that not
everyone plays this way. Ask!)
Opener Responder
1§
1ª
2ª
4ª
pass
This one is
also a bit tricky. If opener ‘promises’ four spades with that raise (as some
play), then responder can leap to game with a four-card spade suit. However, if
opener can have three spades, as most play, then the leap to 4ª shows at least five spades. Ask.
Opener Responder
1¨
1ª
2¨
2©
2NT
3©
4©
pass
Play responder for 5-5 in the majors.
Opener Responder
1¨
1©
2¨ 2ª
2NT
3ª
4©
pass
Play
responder for five spades and six hearts. With 5-5, regardless of strength, the
first response is in spades, the higher-ranking suit, not hearts.
Opener Responder
1¨
1ª
2ª
3NT
pass
Responder has
exactly four spades and denies four hearts. Opener apparently has three spades.
With four spades, opener usually returns to 4ª on
this sequence. However, if opener has promised four spades with the raise,
opener may pass 3NT.
Distributional
inferences change dramatically when the original response is 2NT as opposed to
an original suit response followed by a 2NT rebid.
Opener Responder
1¨
2NT
3§ 3©
3NT
pass
Responder is
balanced and does not figure to have a four-card major. The 3© bid says ‘my hearts are stronger than my spades so don’t
bid 3NT unless you have a spade honor or spade length’. Perhaps responder has: ª Q54 © AKJ ¨ 1076 § K532.
Now compare
the previous sequence to this one:
Opener Responder
1¨
2§
2ª
2NT
3NT
pass
The 2NT rebid does not necessarily promise a
balanced hand; responder might be 3-4-1-5 or
even 3-3-1-6.
Be wary of a
1NT response, particularly to a major-suit opening bid.
Opener Responder
1ª
1NT
3NT
pass
Responder
does not necessarily have a balanced hand. He may have a wildly distributional
hand that is not strong enough to respond at the two level. To give you an idea
of what responder could have: ª void © J8743 ¨ K43 § Q10874.
Sometimes a
1NT responder has a chance to show a six-card minor.
Opener Responder
1©
1NT
2NT
3¨
pass
Play
responder for at least six diamonds, fewer than three hearts, and fewer than
four spades.
In the previous sequences only the opponents were bidding. It was almost as if your side had a case of terminal lockjaw. On most hands the defenders join in and many of the bids your partner makes shows a specific number of cards in a particular suit. For example, if your partner opens 2© weak, you partner has six hearts. If the opponents play the hand, you will know the moment the dummy comes down how many hearts declarer has. (Of course declarer also knows how many hearts you have.)
The more bidding your side does the easier it is to count declarer’s hand. Try this one from the East chair:
North-South Vul ª A93
Dealer South © 96
¨ KQ96
§ A975
North(Dummy)
East(You)
ª 8
© K10852
¨ AJ743
§ J3
West North East South
1©
2ª* Dbl** Pass 2NT
Pass 3NT All Pass
Partner leads the §2,
fourth best. What is declarer’s distribution?
You can do it! Just go back to
the bidding and the opening lead.
There are three clues: declarer’s 1© bid, partner’s 2ª bid and the lead of the §2. Declarer figures to have five hearts (did not rebid hearts); partner should have six spades, leaving declarer three; the §2 shows four, so declarer has three clubs. Putting it all together, declarer should have a 3-5-2-3 hand pattern.
Defenders can also take inferences from what partner does not bid. For example:
West North East South
(You)
1© 1ª
2© 2ª All Pass
Partner’s pass of 2ª
denies six hearts. With six hearts partner is supposed to compete to 3©. Knowing partner has only
five hearts tells you how many hearts declarer has (when dummy comes down).
Similarly your raise to 2©
normally shows three hearts. Holding four hearts you are supposed to compete to
3© yourself. The rule is not
to let the opponents play at the two-level if
your side has a nine-card fit. Important.
When someone preempts
When either side makes a preemptive bid, counting becomes easier for everybody, particularly when the preemptive bidder becomes declarer. Why? Because when declarer is known to have a long suit there are fewer ‘other’ cards left to count!
Both Vul ª K5
Dealer South © 876
¨ KJ109
§ J976
North(Dummy)
West(You)
ª 82
© KQ4
¨ A753
§ A543
West North East South
3ª
All Pass
You lead the ©K, partner encourages with the ©9, and you continue with the ©Q and a heart to partner’s jack, declarer following. Partner switches to §2, declarer plays the king, you win and return §3 (showing four); dummy plays the §9, partner the §10, and declarer ruffs. Are you counting? Declarer exits with a low diamond. What do you do?
Play low. The clues are all there. The bidding tells you that South has seven spades. The play in hearts indicates that declarer has three hearts and declarer is known to have a singleton club. Declarer must be 7-3-2-1, so you want to give declarer a guess in diamonds by playing low.
Declarer’s hand is: ª AQJ10xxx © xxx ¨ xx § K.
One further point. Let’s go back to the heart suit:
© 876
North(Dummy)
West(You) East(loving partner)
© KQ4 © AJ93
South
© 1052
When partner wins the third round of hearts with the ©J, you know partner still has the ©A. However, if partner is careless and wins the third round of hearts with the ©A, partner denies the ©J. Now you have a miscount on the hearts which is why it is mega-important for defenders to take a trick with the lower or lowest equal.
If partner wins a third heart with the ace, and defender eventually leads a diamond, you should fly with your ace playing declarer for a 7-4-1-1 pattern. Can you see now why good players make so many more mistakes when not playing with other good players? Their partners screw them up!